Post by GoldShield on Jun 28, 2004 15:17:12 GMT -5
Aside: Bill, pardon me. I felt that this topic deserved a separate thread to encourage the discussion to more from less appropriate areas, even if it started there. G/S
What do you visitors to this board think? Should Bill (AKA w.com) keep this board anonymous or shall he require complete disclosure of all those posting?
(Leigh) "standish" (Posted elsewhere: Field Completion Date, on: 6/28/2004 at 2:18pm)
I, for one, would have a much higher regard for those who identify themselves, either with a recognizable screen name, associated e-mail address, or, by outright stating who they are. "Anonymous" may be necessary in a different country. In this one, I like to know with whom I'm dealing and respect those who are "stand-up guys" (or women).
Leigh,
I lov' yah, but, I do not agree with you. I am sure this question (ano/nymous) is worth discussing by itself. I am sure that we will find a variety of reasons given for leaving this board the way it is, veiled, leaving most people posting as anonymous as they choose to be. Hell, it might even be worth starting an anonymous poll; what do you think, Bill?
I congratuate Bill for having removed the daggers from his original board without removing the zest from this one. We are all big guys and gals here, right? So we wrassle a little bit! We should be able to take it, right? But, what I do I know (No need to answer, LouS)?
Closing thought: I know you to be world-wise person, Leigh, but I am perplexed by your: "'Anonymous' may be necessary in a different country." Why do we need secret ballots even in the greatest country on earth, the USA, during elections? This board is appropriately anonymous for the same reason.
People are people. I agree with Bill who just posted: "Anonymous is sometimes a good thing."
What do you visitors to this board think? Should Bill (AKA w.com) keep this board anonymous or shall he require complete disclosure of all those posting?
(Leigh) "standish" (Posted elsewhere: Field Completion Date, on: 6/28/2004 at 2:18pm)
I, for one, would have a much higher regard for those who identify themselves, either with a recognizable screen name, associated e-mail address, or, by outright stating who they are. "Anonymous" may be necessary in a different country. In this one, I like to know with whom I'm dealing and respect those who are "stand-up guys" (or women).
Leigh,
I lov' yah, but, I do not agree with you. I am sure this question (ano/nymous) is worth discussing by itself. I am sure that we will find a variety of reasons given for leaving this board the way it is, veiled, leaving most people posting as anonymous as they choose to be. Hell, it might even be worth starting an anonymous poll; what do you think, Bill?
I congratuate Bill for having removed the daggers from his original board without removing the zest from this one. We are all big guys and gals here, right? So we wrassle a little bit! We should be able to take it, right? But, what I do I know (No need to answer, LouS)?
Closing thought: I know you to be world-wise person, Leigh, but I am perplexed by your: "'Anonymous' may be necessary in a different country." Why do we need secret ballots even in the greatest country on earth, the USA, during elections? This board is appropriately anonymous for the same reason.
People are people. I agree with Bill who just posted: "Anonymous is sometimes a good thing."