MrEd
Bronze Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by MrEd on Feb 23, 2006 0:57:07 GMT -5
As our State gets ready for another year of spend and tax, how many company's are fed up and are seeing the writing on the wall and have pulled the plug.
It is amazing when the Mayor of New Haven wants to sue the gun industry and when Winchester announces they are closing, he is shocked and outraged.
The number is growing Stop & Shop, Westvaco, Winchester and the list goes on. At some point maybe our State Leaders will figure out that the same pockets are coming up dry.
|
|
JoeSixpack
Silver Member
This ones for you
Posts: 35
|
Post by JoeSixpack on Feb 12, 2007 21:29:43 GMT -5
Now that our RINO Governor has spoken check out the following article in today's Wall Street Journal (2-12-07) Now She Tells Us February 12, 2007; Page A14 After hiding her intentions during last year's campaign, Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell wants to thank constituents for electing her with 63% of the vote by socking them with a 10% hike in the personal income tax rate. Fellow Republicans in the state legislature are understandably scratching their heads. But the proposal has no doubt also left many taxpayers wondering why they even bother to pull the lever for Republicans.
Ms. Rell dropped this bombshell last week when she presented her biennial budget. In addition to the income tax increase, which would push the top marginal rate to 5.5% from the current 5% over two years, the Governor also proposes increasing cigarette taxes, hiking bus fares and phasing out a $500 property tax credit.
Democrats, who control both houses of the legislature, welcome the plan. So does much of the state's liberal media, who are hailing Ms. Rell as "brave" and "courageous." But as Susan Kniep of the Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations put it to the Associated Press, "Gee, why didn't we kind of hear about this before we went into the polls?"
Governor Rell says a tax increase is necessary to fund more education spending. But Connecticut already spends more money per student on public schools than all but three states. According to the latest Census data, which is from the 2004 school year, Connecticut's per-pupil spending is $10,788, or more than 30% above the national average of $8,287. In such urban districts as New Haven and Hartford, the state is spending well over $13,000 per student, and the state's teachers are among the highest paid in the nation.
All of which suggests that Connecticut's problem isn't too little education spending so much as how current expenditures are being used. For instance, public charter schools in the state, such as New Haven's Amistad Academy and Bridgeport's Bridge Academy, spend thousands of dollars less per-pupil than surrounding traditional public schools. Yet student test scores in math and reading far surpass those of neighboring schools and often match the scores of students in wealthier towns such as Greenwich. Perhaps money isn't what really matters in education achievement.
The larger danger of a tax increase is its impact on the state's overall economy. Connecticut adopted its income tax in 1991, and it has since ranked last nationally in employment growth while losing tens of thousands of people to other states. Increasing the income tax rate seems an odd way to reverse these trends.
"When looking at states that have growing economies and are thriving," said Republican state senator David Cappiello in an interview, "they're the states that either have no income tax or are looking to phase down their income tax. Connecticut is moving in the opposite direction." An income tax hike could also affect whether a small business -- such as a limited liability or Subchapter S corporation -- decides to expand or move to a more business-friendly environment.
By the way, it's not as if Connecticut taxpayers haven't been doing their part; the state will end the current fiscal year with a $600 million revenue surplus. The problem is that the politicians want to spend the money faster than it comes in. Governor Rell's budget would grow government by nearly 13% over two years and bust constitutional spending caps approved by 81% of voters back in 1992. No wonder she kept her plans secret until after the election.
|
|